June 21st, 2023

Perspectives of a Clinical Psychology Professor

As a psychotherapist and state college clinical psychology professor, I know that mental health problems are enormously overdetermined and complex. Many scholars make their careers trying to map these interacting issues that produce suffering and incapacitate people; many of these issues are beyond the scope of our union to directly address. However, there are many salient issues that are within our power to address. These include:

1. DEBT. My students at MCLA are made enormously anxious by their student debt. It is not at all clear to them that they will see a return on their investment in their education, particularly if they fall into a financial crisis, become disabled, or are called to a low-paid field like social work or teaching. They find this terrifying, unjust, and mainly outside of their control. The anxiety this produces often majorly hampers their capacity to engage in their education, to the point that they wind up on academic probation or expelled. I have had multiple advisees fail out of school because of this very issue just this year. If we sent students to college debt-free, we would remove this major determinant of psychological suffering.

2. A LACK OF CAPABLE PROVIDERS. Training to be a psychotherapist is tremendously challenging and expensive; universities mint money with MA and PsyD degrees that provide weak training, leaving many providers under-equipped to address the complex issues that constitute general practice in mental health today, particularly with BIPOC and LGBTQ+ patients. Our state colleges struggle to hire providers who are up to the task of treating our students, because they pay something on the order of 50% of what clinicians earn in private practice and because they require them to see too many students for too short a duration to make a real difference. Too many of our communities do not have local providers who can treat our students, in part because MassHealth fees for services bear no resemblance to the actual market costs of psychotherapy. This issue is an order of magnitude more severe for minor children, because MassHealth puts all manner of onerous demands on providers who see children.

3. LACK OF AFFORDABLE FOOD AND HOUSING. If you do not know where you will sleep tonight, or next month, you cannot be psychologically healthy. If you do not know where your next meal will come from, you cannot be psychologically healthy. This should be entirely obvious--how would any of us feel in such a situation?

4. DISCRIMINATION. It is established psychological fact that experiencing discrimination is bad for our mental health.

5. THEFT OF ATTENTION. Many factors contribute to the theft of our students' attention--social media is a major factor, but so are the kinds of "bandwidth taxes" (per Mullainathan and Shafir) that bedevil poor people, people with disabilities, and other people who are forced into contact with complex bureaucracies to meet their basic survival needs, as many of our students are. When so many forces are stealing and weakening the attention of my students, it makes it enormously difficult to teach them. My students routinely earn bad grades because they cannot do the reading--because they are anxious, distracted, and often because (as many students told me) they have not read a full book in many years. At a minimum, our union can help to reduce theft of attention committed by our educational institutions--for example, by minimizing onerous administrative requirements to maintain matriculation and state aid--as well as fighting to reduce these kinds of "bandwidth taxes" throughout Commonwealth social services.

() |
Comments (2)

Comments (2)

Hi Carter:

Thanks for joining our conversation and posting such a long list of challenges. If you were in charge, where would start in tackling this list? What policies do you think would have the biggest impact the fastest?

()
| Reply

Thanks for the welcome Cindy! I have a few thoughts. The first is that our institutions, in negotiations with the governor's office and relevant management entities, have the power to recruit more and more skilled clinicians. This is going to cost a great deal of money if we want to do it properly, because drawing people away from more remunerative, less difficult work requires providing them with greater financial and quality-of-life incentives. Institutions would also need to invest substantially in training these clinicians, because the present poor state of clinician education means they cannot assume clinicians know how to work with marginalized young people without doing more harm than good.

We also have a fair amount of leverage with respect to access to safe housing and food. At least in the college context, students can reside on campus, and we can have influence on the extent to which the state underwrites room and board--and, crucially, making sure that room and board are available even when school is not in session, since assuming students have another home to return to is an often-faulty middle class assumption.

There are many strategies to target the issue of attention. I only feel confident speaking to the higher-ed space here, but in that context a prioritizing of fewer, more intensive and immersive educational experiences can do much to cultivate deeper attention. These more intensive experiences also put students in deeper relationships with their teachers, who can be a ballast as students struggle through their educations. I tend to think this is a more naturalistic and promising intervention than models of "success coaching" and the like that fob students off onto random faculty and advisors, creating yet more obligations that produce an attentional tax and a sense of atomized alienation. To accomplish this, we would need to advocate for credit-conversion models that encourage faculty to teach more immersive courses, giving them more time with students and more time for prep. In an era of diminished enrollment that is likely to remain for the foreseeable future, this is a wholly realistic and wise use of our resources, even if administrations may be skeptical.

Can you tell that I am very passionate about this stuff (LOL)?? I would be eager to help the MTA work on these issues, especially in the higher ed domain.

()